Delivery Services
Industry, Sen. John A. Kissel Rally Against Proposed
Tax
Say 6% tax
on all deliveries would wreak economic havoc in Connecticut
Leaders of the state’s delivery services industry
joined State Senator John A. Kissel, R-Enfield,
today in calling for the immediate elimination of a
proposed 6% state tax to the delivery charges of all
commercial and consumer goods transported in Connecticut.
At a press conference held today at Bradley International
Airport (BDL) in Windsor Locks, they strongly urged
the legislature’s Finance, Revenue and Bonding
Committee to reconsider the proposal, which passed the
committee on April 4th, amidst objections from Republicans
and industry leaders.
“We are here today because Bradley Airport is
Connecticut’s parcel hub. More packages go in
and out of Bradley Airport on a daily basis than anywhere
else in the state. It is one of the largest economic
generators in North-Central Connecticut so I am very
concerned as to what this tax would do to our region.
I am committed to doing everything I can to make sure
that this proposal is taken off the table. With the
current uncertainty of the economy it’s troubling
that this is even being talked about. I commend those
here today in making a statement against this proposal.”
said Sen. Kissel.
“At a time when private business and state government
are united in their efforts to build Bradley as both
a viable passenger and freight airport I am astounded
at the proposal to impose a 6% delivery tax,”
said Tony DiFusco, Branch Manager A. N. Deringer,
Inc. “Not only will this make us uncompetitive
when compared to other nearby airports, but this tax
will make it that much more difficult for our state's
businesses to compete and do business here. As a company
that has in excess of $1 million in annual business
that is directly tied to BDL I strongly hope the legislature
considers the negative impact such an action will have
on the State's businesses. We should be encouraging
business growth in Connecticut not trying to tax it
out of existence.”
They said that inevitably the tax would be passed on
to other businesses as well. “The businesses numbers
aren’t great now. With high fuel costs and a struggling
national economy, prices for shipping have already increased
and we cannot afford to put any more strains on businesses.
This is certainly not the time for anyone to be talking
about raising taxes on deliveries. Many businesses I
know depend on this service and to impose this type
of tax could be absolutely devastating,” said
Sen. Kissel.
According to Sen. Kissel, in addition to all parcel
delivery services, the tax would also apply to deliveries
on flowers, groceries, newspapers, prescription medicines,
furniture and appliances, home heating fuels and gasoline
wholesalers. “In reality this tax affects everyone
who receives a delivery,” saidSen. Kissel. “We should be doing
everything we can to help create and grow businesses
by reducing costs that will undoubtedly help consumers
and the economy. As someone who represents border towns
I am very concerned as to what that this tax would do
to our region in terms of a competitive disadvantage.
Inevitably, it would have a major impact and one that
we simply cannot afford.”