Senator Judith G. Freedman (R-26) said she agrees with the many constituents who have contacted her to express their disappointment regarding this week's U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kelo et al vs. New London.

"I am quickly losing count of the phone calls and e-mails from constituents who are shocked by the U.S. Supreme Court decision and, frankly, worried that they could find themselves in a similar position someday. People invest a great deal in their homes and property, and not all of that investment is financial. We have all been raised to believe that our government would never, could never, take our property except under the most extraordinary of circumstances. The constituents who are contacting me do not believe that the New London property owners directly affected by this U.S. Supreme Court decision should have lost. And, they wonder what that means for other property owners in Connecticut. I share their concern," said Senator Freedman.

"I am disappointed in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Kelo case and want to reassure my constituents that, like them, I believe that eminent domain is a tool to be used in only the most extraordinary circumstances, not for commercial development. I would be amazed if the General Assembly does not respond by looking into eminent domain issues, and I look forward to the opportunity to work for the best interests of my constituents. Constituents have already suggested we look at amending our state constitution to clearly define under what circumstances eminent domain can be used," said Senator Freedman.